Monday Morning Rally...

...Of the File Nature.

See labels[!]*

*there is reading between the lines and there is not scroll-clicking the hyper links.

[3-10-15 ...'N dot org ? !]^

^(FMuse?) [To pun on footnotes~> and Levi-Strauss.]
[ Strauss:  Neo-changian? ::: Levi? ~ / ~ ? ::: ~> to be adjusted ::: on / Bin(un)Jun'Go ::: pun / Files of the ::: M~kind? ]

and tba 3rd (FN) [ ! =Strauss+changian:  Para~graph Three!   Neo-changian? ::: (?) ^/ ^ ::: org: OurFuture.org ::: dot: Center for American Progress ::: 'N hero/competence? :::  ...  keystone / kids table? ::: 3-10-15 : LOL*regime change* ]
 

Neo-changian?

Naturally Evolving Order !

2-24-15 BIN~GO[!]
A fifth dimention or shun*. See (e,r,s)

C-BIN: Neo-con Pope?  Saint maybe, you can't have a dead Pope, but it would be more convenient.
Not to mention RE:cc(card carrying; Nietzsche?)  Methane?(~)

(~) wordplay @"BIN" especially :50 mark.  Eggs in one hen?

FP here{in one}.
(egg,road, sky: a. FP4 SEPT 2014 , b. Work in Progress , c. Egg/Road/Sky* , d. Speculative Physics )
Self- anomaly
St. Maybe[!]  Rooting^ for Strauss[?]

^Pla(N)tonic(~)
*  Forward (Ironically) (S~hun~T[!])
??? 

Neo-Changian

An Exchange: In segments
(These are some comments I compiled on hold, including an exchange with FB)
Thom Hartmann

Me: On hold with Thom Hartmann, AM1090 Seattle, just missing the Laffer Curve creator, and up next will be Joe Stieglitz.

Summit
Me: In the spirit of the summit, I point to the political down side of some discussion, not that politics is bad, but a process. Much like the Laffer Curve, it depends on which side you are on. Laffer seems to misuse his own curve and extend it to all taxes...

Flat metaphor
Me(cont)...while a flat tax may not be bad, what it is and where it starts is what matters. Even Milton Friedman apparently in the Libertarian wing, suggested a Negative tax. I would love to have the opportunity, ask Nobel winner Stieglitz(about these)

Neo_changian
Me: Apparently out of time, but the metaphor of the "Invisible Hand" of Adam Smith is equivalent to the Laffer Curve at least in how you look at it. There is a real curve and a real hand, although it does depend on individuals to use it and which side your are on. i.e. Neo-Keynsian or more of the change

Exchange
FB: if you want to be a capitalist, actually read Adam Smith's The Wealth of Nations from cover to cover. ALL of it.

Me: Someday. But did you hear Thom Hartmann with Laffer and Stieglitz? More of your point... please. Mine may have been missed. I might quibble with the (my) equivalence, but not how we look at it mattering. Being on one side of the Laffer Curve statistically, as in raising or lowering taxes(or rather income), matters. Yet, there being no hand really, but the hand the individual has in creating government and corporations is what I meant. Not that they are Leviathans, woops other league (of a book), but it is important to note that Wealth of Nations was written in 1776 so we really have created a hand.

[Update 2-26-10 speaking of summit spirit and comprehensive... well...(is this a cheap shot?) ]

Knot too

B 3 D...

The context ... 
somewhere embedded in(~) the rational?

(~) Monday Morning Rally...,  Hegelian Rationality?, Neo-changian?

4-1-15 update of sorts :
Not to be 3~D.
The Transformational Israeli-Saudi Alliance
Poll: Republicans See Obama as More Imminent Threat Than Putin
Obama Is Not Anti-War

Hegelian Rationality?

HR? Proposed Concept.

For the science religion dichotomy/dilemma. (1-2)
Rationality and irrationality at(3) the same table, and in the same chair.  (shoes/feet/mouth/toss)*
VC: a Virtuous Clog?  P5+1 example.  Cotton pick'n GOP another. 
State of Strauss and the Torah the antithesis? 

Zion is asemantic!

Process proposal?  Kant we... Waltz?

*pundittering additions
(#'d)inserts [ s~r , d/d ]  :: (3) youtube IAM  :: VC vital cognisance? :: State'n Hegel? 
Original aphorism?  (Wit'N Pythagorus)
Lables TBA : T'issue Tan'go?  :: (to be Kantinued)

M-bed F'N:
Strauss :  a. No Teddy , Para~graph Three! , Monday Morning Rally... , Bin(un)Jun'Go , Hegelian Rationality? , Neo-changian? , Relemma'n Leo , Esoteric Relemma[!]
  
RIG^ / SOG subj/obj geometry  : RIG'N progress ~ N = poetics^ / Nietzsche? (tot~ology)
 [ dit , IF,  IW ] ~ lie`bearE? akin to NFR~'Y
Numbers R objective ideal and subjective reality? Cultural conditioning? 25~min.> systemic analysis/
meanfeltic[!] stastical rhetoric?  Meta-Clastic?

More Gill Let?

More Flex-balls ?
Fertil~ized ?
More Cowbell?

M: Tale of Two Bullies!Tale of Two Bullies!, C:O/ Caging Godzillas , W/ On the level...
F: (*)Carry On Comment!, Perspectivism, The Other Debates, Jeb Bush is full of Cow Pie! , Whistle Blowing in the Dark?, Z: Neo-changian? , (*)Recycling Trash, Here We Go Again, D&R Tan ya?, ?: Too Random...
or: A? Anticipation Project ^, P? Politics Local and National
FB? The Guardian?

[image tbi ] 

more cowbell









[image tbi ]  ( )

[finally/gnot exactly]
[But a D'R win of some de men shun.]






i. Bury the lede?
e. i.e. S.E. (vi) edgy

NFRY~(not fully rel8d yet)
Not 2 B  con`fused ... w/o?
(FN^)  The Other Debates, Perspectivism, Jeb Bush is full of Cow Pie!
oar
o.w. / or Pen ta go(~)'N ?

Let Alone... D(R)N~A ?*
   
* Ctrl F~M-beds @ S. .C 
C-O~W[tbK(o)?] nPS?
WTB ? [!] (.  .  .)

Deep Thoughts

Still Processing ...*





*not so punderous ponderings [~]

( Manichean  TryUnism )


7-12-15
Similar Reading in Progress.
[Exploding the being paradigm. post~temporality "~"]


No Teddy ("~)' ^
Hegelian Rationality?
Bin(un)Jun'Go
Neo-changian?
Relemma'n Leo
Esoteric Relemma[!]


^ accidental perspectivism
(sub-narrative: still processing)
[tangent~"political theorist" & the calling.]

Presidential Take

The media does not always reflect the exact meaning of a presidential comment,
but I hope this one does.
The 2010 election will be the verdict on congressional action, rather than inaction.(my take)

Here are two quick clips. Senator Reid & Senator Alexander
Blair House Summit White House Summary

[Highlights]
[Special Hardball, Hardball, Hardball (1,4,7&9 of 9). *]

UPDATES:[*] 2-26-10 two links added [<-2]also these: earlier summit post , pre-summit summary, pre-summit push and pitch. Not to mention new swing. Admittedly Republicans "don't do comprehensive well". No, really well. And why.] (Really the issue addressed at Neo-Changian points to the comprehensive need, apparently Senator Alexander believes in the finger approach in spirit.

* There is a way that reconciliation will not be used on the whole bill, and I would suggest that it would be impossible for the Republicans to vote against changes that they brought up in the summit or at least getting an up or down vote. See Willie Brown and more, speaking of what will Brown do? The Senator(MA) and Attorney General(CA).

Order of Inserts

 6-3-15 Not Exactly ?

6-16-15 Back from Tangent? The lede is Chomsky! 
From the brackets up:
(b.s.) pinnacle+disciplines #1 Discipline - Philosophy
(b.s.) Art+Young Forward (Ironically)
(b.s.) dimentions [A thru I]
A. Counter Intelligence, B., C. Ouroboros, D. Ghost Busters , E., F.,   
G. Throwing the Game, H. Facebook Town Hall (amended), I. Dimentions
(b.s.) Oriental+German Economics 2011

Tangent/Spoiler Alert [Let alone to read later]:  (or move FP?)
The point is in the Orient~ation, or Ergonomics of Change...or Ergodynamics of Culture.
To break down the Ying-Yang and Jung, there are languages of various nature. 
Words, Numbers, Symbols...far be it from me to label a forth. 
former: a. Neo-changian?, b. Recycling Trash, c. Here We Go Again, d. D&R Tan ya?
latter: A. Bring It On!, B. Hang down your head Paul Krugman!